Zelda, 2006

User avatar
Archive
Posts: 891479
Joined: June 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Zelda, 2006

Post by Archive » June 28th, 2019, 7:06 am

posted by cahaz on Aug 16, 2005:

.. and i doubt it will in the future either. : /

if nintendo would still release Twilight Princess in november, i think it could somehow ''resurect'' the cube in advance. you know, november is the best month to release a video game, 'cause it's near the holyday. TP will sell alot of gamecubes, especially if it would be released in the holydays, and you know that no other games could sell a cube so much, just go back in time and see how OOT made an impact to n64 sales. Now, more consoles means more potential costumers for a game, wich is a good thing to attract third parties. More third party games means that the cube could
survive all the way to 2007, especially if the cube price goes down, since microsoft said they would like to completly switch to the x360 as soon as possible, and that the ps2 is less powerfull and that it's not the center of attention anymore. Next-gen games' production cost will get really high, so the old gen will last longer than before, imo. add the fact that kids will want that new x360 for christmas, but not every parents will afford the cost of the machine, but they'll know their son want a new system, and there's that new zelda playing on a really affordable system. If you take it like that, the x360 wouldn't be that bad for nintendo.
 

User avatar
Archive
Posts: 891479
Joined: June 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Zelda, 2006

Post by Archive » June 28th, 2019, 7:06 am

posted by GaijinPunch on Aug 16, 2005:

Taemos said:




Nintendo has a battle ahead of them, then. I can't see them coming out of this one intact... Sony seems to be making pretty bad decisions as well, if the pricing and development difficulty rumours are true.

Well, everyone said that about the PS2... "It's too hard to program for. It'll die. Dreamcast will kill it." And look what happened. Image

Inded, they are making bad decisions though.
 

User avatar
Archive
Posts: 891479
Joined: June 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Zelda, 2006

Post by Archive » June 28th, 2019, 7:06 am

posted by Mr. Casual on Aug 16, 2005:

Zelda in 2006. Damn. Oh well, they can make an awesome looking title even cooler with all that time.
 

User avatar
Archive
Posts: 891479
Joined: June 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Zelda, 2006

Post by Archive » June 28th, 2019, 7:06 am

posted by Evangelion-01 on Aug 16, 2005:

god dammit..
 

User avatar
Archive
Posts: 891479
Joined: June 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Zelda, 2006

Post by Archive » June 28th, 2019, 7:06 am

posted by Mark30001 on Aug 16, 2005:

madhatter256 said:




This is the only game that will make me buy a GC...

I totally agree with ya! I would have bought the the 1st GC Zelda game back then before the GameCube was even released, if the author wouldn't have suddenly changed the characters to look like damn cartoons! Image

Remember the previews? Those were great, until all of a sudden you see a Link that looked like he came right out of some kids cartoon.

Well... this is the way Zelda should have been! I just hope Nintendo can release it for the Revolution without jeopardizing their future. That would seriously make me wanna get a Revo...
 

User avatar
Archive
Posts: 891479
Joined: June 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Zelda, 2006

Post by Archive » June 28th, 2019, 7:06 am

posted by cahaz on Aug 16, 2005:

Oh please, not that ''Wind Waker sucks ans is for kid cuz it's cel-shaded and cartoonish!!!1!'' again.. -_-
 

User avatar
Archive
Posts: 891479
Joined: June 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Zelda, 2006

Post by Archive » June 28th, 2019, 7:06 am

posted by Mark30001 on Aug 16, 2005:

Hehehe, I never got around playing it. Did it have a good storyline?
 

User avatar
Archive
Posts: 891479
Joined: June 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Zelda, 2006

Post by Archive » June 28th, 2019, 7:06 am

posted by Jasonkhowell on Aug 16, 2005:

Mark30001 said:




Hehehe, I never got around playing it. Did it have a good storyline?

Story was decent. I personally thought it lacked the emotion OoT and MM had until the very last area, but it was still pretty good. Too bad the Cel-Shaded link model looked like crap.
 

User avatar
Archive
Posts: 891479
Joined: June 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Zelda, 2006

Post by Archive » June 28th, 2019, 7:06 am

posted by Alien Workshop on Aug 16, 2005:

Mark30001 said:




Hehehe, I never got around playing it. Did it have a good storyline?

I thought it was better than OOT, and Gannon was actually *gasp* tough. You shouldn't judge a book by its cover. I loved every minute of that game, and I think the cel-shaded graphics were perfect. I'm kind of disappointed that they aren't using the cel-shaded graphics for this new one.
 

User avatar
Archive
Posts: 891479
Joined: June 25th, 2019, 11:00 am

Zelda, 2006

Post by Archive » June 28th, 2019, 7:06 am

posted by sayin999 on Aug 16, 2005:

sucks, but im not shocked, it seemed that the game was comingout way too soon, and lets face it, no one wants to play a zelda that is underpar, cause i know that nintendo does not like to release stuff unless it is at least decent, but im guessing that they just dont want to screw this up, funny how one of 64s big last game was majoras mask, and this too will probably it, though im shocked mario 128 never got comelete for cube, would have saved nintendo quite a grace.
 

Locked